THE ROLE OF EDUCATIONAL ADMINISTRATIONS IN PROMOTING QUALITY SELF EVALUATION IN EDUCATIONAL CENTRES

The project will last for 3 academic years starting in september 2000 and finishing in August 2003.

WORKPLAN PERIOD 2001-2003

September 2000	June 01/ February 02
January 2001	February 2002
February 2001	February/ May 2002
March 2001	June 2002
March 28^th, 29^th, 30^th, 31^st and 1^st April	October 2002
March 29^th, 30^th	November/ March 2003
April/ May 2001	March 2003
June 2001	March/ June 2003
20^th, 21^st , 22^nd, 23^rd and 24^th June 2001	June 2003

September 2000	Activities undertaken	Forming working teams.	[Top]
	Aims	To create the work group.
	Location	In every country.
	Expected benefits	Consolidate a working group.
	Lead partner, others oartners involved in the activities undertaken	Each partner in every country.
	Products and results	Definition composition work groups. Definition of responsibilities.

January 2001	Activities undertaken	Designing a checklist, a questionnaire and a grill. (Annex 1-2)	[Top]
	Aims	Facilitate to gather the information.
	Location	Catalonia-Spain.
	Expected benefits	Facilitate working process.
	Lead partner, others oartners involved in the activities undertaken	Co-ordinator
	Products and results	1^st draft of the checklist, grill and questionnaire.

February 2001	Activities undertaken	To complete the questionnaire and the grill. Revision of the checklist.	[Top]
	Aims	To start gathering information about every educational system and evaluation processes.
	Location	In every country.
	Expected benefits	To improve the mutual knowledge and collaboration with exchange and presentation of the documentation elaborated.
	Lead partner, others oartners involved in the activities undertaken	Each partner in every country.
	Products and results	Documents with information gathered. Suggestions to modify the checklist draft.

March 2001	Activities undertaken	Meeting with a group of schools.	[Top]
	Aims	To prepare the exchange between the schools in self evaluation theme.
	Location	Catalonia-Spain. Norway.
	Expected benefits	Reflection about the elements in the own self evaluation processes.
	Lead partner, others oartners involved in the activities undertaken	Partners from Norway and Catalonia.
	Products and results	Documentation about Self evaluation processes to present and share.

March 28^th, 29^th, 30^th, 31^st and 1^st April	Activities undertaken	First encounter in Barcelona ( Minutes Annex 3). Presentation materials from every country related with evaluation. Revision of the project. Analyse 1^st draft checklist. Reorganisation of the checklist. Elaborate a new checklist. Definition of task to be accomplished by partners. Evaluation work done.	[Top]
	Aims	Update the project. To elaborate a new checklist. To have elements to evaluate the work done.
	Location	Barcelona
	Expected benefits	To obtain better mutual knowledge and understanding. To elaborate a new. checklist adjusted to the specific information we need to gather. (Annex 7). To analyse the work done in order to improve the future actions.
	Lead partner, others oartners involved in the activities undertaken	All the partners co-ordinated by the co-ordinator
	Products and results	Documentation related with evaluation from every country. New checklist. Evaluations grills completed.

March 29^th, 30^th	Activities undertaken	Teachers and heads interchange ( Minutes Annex 4-5).	[Top]
	Aims	To involve participant centres into the project.
	Location	Barcelona.
	Expected benefits	To obtain a mutual enrichment to improve self evaluation processes.
	Lead partner, others oartners involved in the activities undertaken	Catalonia as a co-ordinator and Norway partner.
	Products and results	Exchange of experiences and documents(Annex.6).

April/ May 2001	Activities undertaken	Working groups in every country. Answering the 1^st part of the checklist. To send all the information to the co-ordinator. Preparing the presentation about self evaluation activities done in every country. To prepare the interim report.	[Top]
	Aims	Gathering information, documentation and materials. To prepare presentation next encounter. To elaborate the interim report.
	Location	In every country.
	Expected benefits	Reflecting and deeping about every self evaluation system. Reflections about the work done.
	Lead partner, others oartners involved in the activities undertaken	Each partner in own country. Co-ordinated by the co-ordinator.
	Products and results	1^st part checklist completed. Documents to present in the next encounter. The interim report.

June 2001 Stage 1 (01/06/01-19/06/01)	Activities undertaken	Revision of materials received. Create a web site. Preparation next encounter.	[Top]
	Aims	Facilitate the comparison study. Facilitate next encounter.
	Location	Catalonia - Spain. Norway.
	Expected benefits	Facilitate working process and communication.
	Lead partner, others oartners involved in the activities undertaken	Lead partner. Lead partner jointly Norwegian .
	Products and results	Web site. Programme next encounter.

Stage 2 20^th, 21^st , 22^nd, 23^rd and 24^th June 2001	Activities undertaken	Second encounter Suldal. (Norway) Exposition about activities developed and documents about self evaluation presented by Norway and Belgium. Analyse 1^st part checklist answered. Reorganisation the information gathered. Revision questions checklist part 2 and 3. Interchange of test to evaluate basic competences:Norway-Catalonia (Spain). Definition task to be accomplished by partners. Planification to involve schools from every country in a Cormenius project about seflevaluation. School visit. Budget revision. Evaluation work done.	[Top]
	Aims	A better knowledge about the own evaluation system and the others. To put in common the information collected with the first part of checklist. To prepare the work to make the comparative study.
	Location	Norway.
	Expected benefits	Better mutual knowledge. Better understanding about the information gathered. Facilitate the work to start the comparative study.
	Lead partner, others oartners involved in the activities undertaken	All partners co-ordinated by the co-ordinator. Norwegian partner. Lead partner.
	Products and results	Documents from both countries about selfvaluation. First part checklist completed. Questions second part checklist reviewed. Minutes:meeeting and school visit. Evaluation sheets.

Stage 3 June 01/ February 02 (25/06/01-30/01/02)	Activities undertaken	Working groups in every country. Answering the 2^nd and 3^rd part of the checklist. To send all the information to the co-ordinator. Preparing the documentation for Preparatory visit of Primary and Secindary school in next encounter. Translation of Catalan instruments for selfevaluation processes. Design a grid to start the comparative study. Preparing the presentation about selfevaluation activities done in Belgium. Preparing next encounter.	[Top]
	Aims	To gather information, documentation and materials. To start to elaborate the final product. To prepare presentation next encounter.
	Location	In every country.
	Expected benefits	Better mutual knowledge. Better understanding about the information gathered. Facilitate the work to start the comparative study.
	Lead partner, others oartners involved in the activities undertaken	All partners in each country. Lead partner. Belgian partner. Lead partner and Belgian partner.
	Products and results	Checklist par 2^nd and 3^rd completed. Application form for Preparatory visit. Instrument for selfevaluation process in English. A grid to start the comparative study. Programme next encounter.

Stage 4 February 2002 (31/01/02-03/02/02)	Activities undertaken	Encounter in Brussels (Belgium) Exposition about activities developed and documents about self evaluation presented for every partner. Analyse 2nd^st and 3^rd part checklist answered. Reorganisation the information gathered. Presentation revision and approvement the grid to start the comparative study. Definition task to be accomplished by partners. Parallel meeting : with Primary and Secondary schools of each country involved in a Comenius project about selfevaluation. Schools visits. Budget revision. Discussion and approval to have and extra meeting in Italy to prepare the final product-International course. Evaluation work done.	[Top]
	Aims	To put in common the information collected. To Analyse the information collected, second part of checklist. To Review the third part of checklist. To Continue the elaboration international comparative study. To start to defining the final product.
	Location	Brussels
	Expected benefits	Revise own models about self evaluation. To have elements trying to improve own self evaluation system.
	Lead partner, others oartners involved in the activities undertaken	Belgian and Scottish partners. All Partners co-ordinated by the lead partner. Belgian partner. Lead partner.
	Products and results	Documentation about selfevaluation from Belgium and Scotlan. Last version checklist parts 2nd^st and 3^rd. Last version grid. Minutes steering group meeting,Primary and Secondary school meeting and schools visit. Evaluation sheets.

Stage 5 February/ May 2002 (04/02/02-31/05/02)	Activities undertaken	Working groups in every country. Starting the comparative study based in1^st, 2nd^st and 3^rd part of the checklist. Send all information to the responsible of each part. Portugal send instruments related on selfevaluation. Preparing the presentation about selfevaluation activities done in Scottland. Preparing next encounter. Update the website. Elaboration interim report.	[Top]
	Aims	To gather information, documentation and materials. To continue elaborating the final product.
	Location	In every country
	Expected benefits	Revise own models about self evaluation. To have elements trying to improve the own self evaluation system.
	Lead partner, others oartners involved in the activities undertaken	All partners in each country. Portuguese partner. Scottish partner. Lead partner and Scottish partner. Lead partner.
	Products and results	Firts draft on the comparative study grid completed. Portuguese documents about selfevaluation. Documents to present in next encounter. Encounter programme. Web site updated. Interim report.

Stage 6 June 2002 (01/06/02-04/06/02)	Activities undertaken	Working groups in every country. Continuing the international comparative study about self evaluation in every country based in the 2^nd part of the checklist. Preparing the presentation about self evaluation activities done in every country. First draft final product.	[Top]
	Aims	To continue the comparative study. To prepare presentation next encounter. To start to design the final product.
	Location	In every country
	Expected benefits	To continue improving in the knowledge about self evaluation experiences and models in every country
	Lead partner, others oartners involved in the activities undertaken	Documents to present in the next encounter. First draft of comparative study based in the second part of the checklist. First draft final product.
	Products and results	All partners co-ordinated by the co-ordinator

October 2002	Activities undertaken	4^th encounter in Scotland. Exposition about activities developed and documents about self evaluation presented for every partner. Analyse 3^rd part checklist. Reorganisation the information gathered. Revision and reorganisation of the comparative study part 2. Discuss about final product. Definition task to be accomplished by partners. Evaluate work done.	[Top]
	Aims	To put in common the information collected. Analyse the information collected, third part of checklist. Continuing the elaboration of international comparative study. To elaborate a draft of the final product.
	Location	Scotland
	Expected benefits	To complete the knowledge about self evaluation experiences and models in every country
	Lead partner, others oartners involved in the activities undertaken	Third part of checklist completed. Second part of comparative study completed. Evaluation grills completed. Design final product (an international course).
	Products and results	All partners co-ordinated by the co-ordinator

November/ March 2003	Activities undertaken	Working groups in every country. Ending the elaboration of the international comparative study. Designing the piloting of the final product.	[Top]
	Aims	To finish the international comparative study. To design the pilot programme for the final product.
	Location	In every country.
	Expected benefits	To complete the knowledge about self evaluation experiences and models in every country.
	Lead partner, others oartners involved in the activities undertaken	Draft of the total comparative study completed. First draft of pilot programme for final product.
	Products and results	All partners co-ordinator by the co-ordinator.

March 2003	Activities undertaken	5^th encounter in Portugal Discuss and ending the comparatives study. Discuss about the pilot programme for final product. Evaluation work done.	[Top]
	Aims	To validate the international comparative study. To decide the programme for the final product.
	Location	Portugal
	Expected benefits	To obtain mutual enrichment and improve in self evaluation
	Lead partner, others oartners involved in the activities undertaken	Comparative study finished. Programme for final product.
	Products and results	All partners co-ordinator by the co-ordinator.

March/ June 2003	Activities undertaken	Working groups in every country. Pilot the final product ( the international course). Print and disseminate the comparative study. Prepare the final report.	[Top]
	Aims	To obtain elements to validate the programme for the final product. To publish the comparative study.
	Location	In every country.
	Expected benefits	Dissemination the results of the comparative study.
	Lead partner, others oartners involved in the activities undertaken	Draft programme final product validate. The comparative study published.
	Products and results	All partners co-ordinator by the co-ordinator.

June 2003	Type of activity	6^th encounter in Barcelona. Validate the pilot experience. Define the final programme for the final product. Seminar to disseminate the research done. Evaluate the work done.	[Top]
	Aims	To obtain a final programme for the final product. To disseminate the results of the project. To elaborate the final repor.
	Location	Barcelona
	Expected benefits	The dissemination of the results of the project
	Lead partner, others oartners involved in the activities undertaken	Definitive programme for the final product. Documents and materials for the Seminar. Final report.
	Products and results	All partners co-ordinator by the co-ordinator.